Visual Productions forum

Products => CueluxPro => Topic started by: bourby on March 21, 2014, 06:59:08 AM

Title: Covering old ground
Post by: bourby on March 21, 2014, 06:59:08 AM
Sorry, was told this once before but can't find it.

If I lose ethernet link to the CueCore, it all goes dead.

There was a way to setup a scene the unit goes to when connection is lost, what's that procedure?
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: Julien Levaufre on March 21, 2014, 08:16:41 AM
dump your "safety cuelist" into the cuecore memory.
Then in the show edtor of the c uecore ( via web browser) set the memory track to be started when the cuecore start up.
This way the memory is always running until you get connected to cuelux pro, and if you get disconected, the memory goes back.
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: Maarten Engels on March 22, 2014, 11:52:34 AM
Unless specified otherwise, the CueCore will playback cue1 when it is not mastered by CueluxPro. Therefor I would recommend putting your 'safety cue' in cue1. This is done by: DUMP 1 <enter>
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: bourby on April 06, 2014, 06:17:01 AM
Does this cue stay there in a power cycle?
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: Dennis Kromhout on April 07, 2014, 09:20:24 AM
Yes, dumped/recorded cues are stored in the CueCore's internal flash memory
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: bourby on April 07, 2014, 02:15:53 PM
Excuse me if I missed this.

Do we have the equivalent of stacks in pro now?
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: Boyd Nijsten on April 07, 2014, 04:49:44 PM
A sort of, yes.
I run all my different dimmer chases at 1 cuelist. I've linked the last cue of a cycle back to the first cue of a cycle (with the link feature in the cuelist editing window). Then I have another cuelist which has a number of empty cues, and each cue has a task function to jump the "stacked" cuelist to the first cue of a cycle. When setting times on the task cuelist, or using go+ you can control the stacked cuelist. Works kinda the same ;)
Title: Re: Covering old ground
Post by: bourby on April 08, 2014, 11:52:30 AM
That sounds really messy and unworkable.

Can you provide a better solution team. This is meant to be the "pro" version.